Babu v. Anandan
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal involved a dispute regarding the production of relevant documents refused by the lower appellate court. The High Court held that documents received after trial conclusion were relevant, noting their late acceptance was justified under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC.
What did the court decide?
Impugned judgment and decree set aside; matter remitted to lower appellate court for fresh consideration; documents accepted as exhibits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/13TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RSA.No. 1489 of 2013 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 24-07-2013 IN AS 60/2011 of II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 07-09-2010 IN OS 142/2005 of SUB COURT, NEYYATTINKARA
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
BABU, S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED 53 YEARS,
POTTAKKULAM VEEDU, KANJIRAMKULAM DESOM, KANJIRAMKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether relevant documents received after trial conclusion should be accepted under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Babu, S/O. Krishnan
- respondent
Anandan, S/O. Chellan Nadar
Coram
K. Harilal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court