accepted by the court in O.S.No.124 of 2007. Consequently, the declaration of title sought by the first defendant over the suit property was declined. The first defendant was, however, granted a decree in the said suit restraining Ebrahim from evicting her from the suit property otherwise than by due process of law. Later, Ebrahim filed O.S.No.447 of 2007 for recovery of possession of suit property from the first defendant. During the pendency of the said suit, the suit property was transferred by Ebrahim to the plaintiff as per Ext.A6 gift. Since the suit property was gifted to the plaintiff, Ebrahim did not pursue O.S.No.447 of 2007. Consequently, O.S.No.447 of 2007 was dismissed as not pressed. The present suit was filed thereupon by the plaintiff seeking a decree of mandatory injunction directing the defendants to surrender vacant possession of the suit property to the plaintiff. The defendants resisted the suit. The contention raised by the defendants in the written statement was that Ext.A6 gift is invalid as the plaintiff has not obtained possession of the suit property from the donor as per the terms of the gift. The trial court rejected the
