M. Poonkothal v. Albin. P.J
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/10TH KARTHIKA, 1938
RSA.NO. 1070 OF 2015 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10-07-2015 IN A.S. NO.56/2014 OF THE VI ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28-11-2013 IN O.S. NO.613/2010 OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1. M. POONKOTHAI, W/O.A.SIVASUBRAMANYAN, 36/567, SREEMURUGHA NIVAS, P.F.O. ROAD, KALOOR-17.
2. STEPHEN, S/O.KUNJAVARA, VEVUKATTU HOUSE, DOOR NO.133, VARAPPUZHA POST, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. ALBIN. P.J., S/O.JOSEPH, PARATHARA HOUSE, AZAD ROAD, ASRAMAM LANE, KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017.
2. MARY VARGHESE,
3. KARMALY JOSEPH, W/O.LATE JOSEPH, C/O.CELENE, NEAR KUZHIVELI TEMPLE,
PANDARAPATTATHIL VEEDU, CHALIKKAVATTOM, VENNALA POST, ERNAKULAM.
4. CELENE JOSEPH, W/O.LATE JOSEPH, PARATHARA VEEDU, CHALIKKAVATTOM, VENNALA POST, ERNAKULAM-682 028.
5. REETHA THOMAS, W/O. THOMAS, VADAKKEDATH HOUSE, CHALIKKAVATTOM, VENNALA POST, ERNAKULAM-682 028.
(..2)
RSA.NO. 1070 OF 2015 (B)
6. C.V.SEBASTIAN, S/O.VARUTHUKUTTY, CHEENIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VYLOPPILLY BYE LANE, AZAD ROAD, KALOOR, COCHIN-17.
R1 BY ADVS. SRI.S.VINOD BHAT SRI.LEGITH T.KOTTAKKAL SRI.K.A.SHAJI MATHEW
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DST
K. HARILAL, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.S.A. No. 1070 of 2015
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellants submits
that the matter in dispute is settled out of court between the parties themselves and the appellants filed a memo with a prayer to close the appeal.
Consequently, this Regular Second Appeal will stand closed accordingly.
Sd/-
K. HARILAL,
JUDGE
DST
//True copy//
P.A. To Judge
M. POONKOTHAI
STEPHEN
ALBIN. P.J.
MARY VARGHESE
KARMALY JOSEPH
CELENE JOSEPH
K. HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court