Review petitions challenging an interim common judgment in writ appeals were dismissed by the Court, holding that the review jurisdiction does not contemplate a rehearing of contentions already decided and no substantial grounds for review were found.
Review petitions dismissed as the judgment did not warrant review.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2016/2ND CHAITHRA, 1938
RP.No. 864 of 2014 () IN WA.444/2013 -------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WA 444/2013 DATED 24.9.2014 ----------------
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANTS :-
1. P.S.PARAMESWARAN NAMBOOTHIRI RESIDING AT PERAMBOOR ILLAM, KUDAMALOORKARA, AYMANAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM.
2. K.K.KRISHNAN NAMBOOTHIRI RESIDING AT MADHUMANDIRAM, KUDAMALOORKARA, AYMANAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI SMT.SABINA JAYAN
RESPONDENT(S) :-
1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEVASWOM BOARD BUILDING, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM BOARD BUILDINGS, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU, SC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-03-2016 ALONG WITH R.P.No.222/2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
R.P. No.864 of 2014 in W.A. No.444 of 2013 and R.P. No.222 of 2016 in W.A. No.365 of 2013
--------------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 22nd day of March 2016
O R D E R
Shaffique, J.
These review petitions are filed against the common judgment dated 24.9.2014 in W.A.Nos.444 of 2013 and 365 of 2013 inter alia contending that the judgment calls for review in so far as certain issues raised by the petitioners have not been considered while delivering the judgment.
Under such circumstances, we do not think that the judgment warrants review and accordingly, these review petitions are dismissed.
Sd/-
ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
Jvt/23.3.2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the grounds raised in the review petition warrant a reconsideration of the judgment in the writ appeals.
Whether the review petition seeks a rehearing of contentions already decided by the lower court.
P.S.Parameswaran Namboothiri
K.K.Krishnan Namboothiri
The Travancore Devaswom Board
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
