Binu .S v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala in a review petition allowed the petitioner to remit the 2nd and 3rd instalments of a monetary obligation on 06.09.2016, deviating from the earlier judgment's payment deadline of 06.08.2016.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner is permitted to remit the 2nd and 3rd instalments on 06/09/2016.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/25TH SRAVANA, 1938
RP.No. 671 of 2016 ()
JUDGMENT DATED 06-06-2016 IN WP(C) 11128/2016.
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BINU.S,S/O.C.S.SADASIVAN, AGED 42 YEARS, RAMAMANGALAM, M.G.ROAD, ADOOR.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
SMT.D.S.THUSHARA
RESPONDENT:
BANK OF BARODA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, ADOOR BRANCH, ADOOR-689 645.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the review petition filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the judgment to permit remittance of the 2nd and 3rd instalments on 06/09/2016 should be allowed.
Whether the High Court, in review, can permit the petitioner to remit the outstanding instalments on a future date despite the original payment deadline having passed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BINU.S S/O.C.S.SADASIVAN
- respondent
BANK OF BARODA
Coram
AM SHAFFIQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court