This court dismissed a review petition filed by the Corporation against a High Court order directing the Government to consider exemption applications from ESI Act provisions. The court held the review was not maintainable given alternative avenues of challenge.
The review petition stands dismissed as it is found to be not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2016/11TH JYAISHTA, 1938
R.P.No.531 of 2006 IN W.P.C).No.13622/2004 (W)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C).NO.13632/2004-W DATED 30.03.2006 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/ 4TH RESPONDENT:-
KERALA STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED AND KELTRON GROUP OF CAMPANIES, KELTRON HOUSE, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR.
RESPONDENT(S)/ PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:-
R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS
R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MONOJ P.KUNJACHAN.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:-
R.P.NO.531 OF 2006 IN W.P.(C) NO.13632 OF 2004-W
APPENDIX
REVIEW PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
ANNEXURE I TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.54-T.11/13/OP 11656/98-LEGAL, DATED 28.2.2006 OF THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION.
ANNEXURE II TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 11.3.1993 OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:-
NIL.
Vku/[ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J
--------------------------------------------------------------------R.P.No.531 of 2006 in W.P.(C) No.13632 of 2004-W
--------------------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 01st day of June, 2016
ORDER
None appears for the petitioner or the respondents.
RP.531 of 2006 in - 2 - WP(C).13632 of 2004
any event if the Government rejects the prayer made by the Unions, they could challenge the same. The Corporation also could challenge the denial made in their representation. In such circumstances, the review is found to be not maintainable and the same stands dismissed.
Sd/-
K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
Vku/-
[ true copy ]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition filed by the Corporation challenging a direction to the Government to consider exemption applications is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation Limited and Keltron Group of Companies
Keltron Employees Association (CITU)
Keltron Employees Union (INTUC)
Keltron Employees Organisation
State of Kerala
Employees State Insurance Corporation
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
