Sivaraman v. Geologist
Case brief
What is this about?
In a review petition, the High Court of Kerala directed the Geologist to permit the petitioner to compound the offence at a fee determined by the Geologist and subsequently issue the O(A) Form.
What did the court decide?
Direction to allow petitioner to compound the offence and issue O(A) Form after compounding.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/5TH MAGHA, 1937
RP.No. 32 of 2016
JUDGMENTDATED 08-10-2015 IN WP(C) 30618/2015.
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SIVARAMAN, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O AYYAPPANKUTTY, PALLATH HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SMT.P.R.REENA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
GEOLOGIST, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR, PIN- 680 003.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUNJACHAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to an order to review the judgment in W.P.(C) No.30618/2015 to compel the Geologist to permit compounding of the offence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SIVARAMAN
- respondent
GEOLOGIST
Coram
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court