in accordance with the directions in the said judgment by the authority for clarification. What happened in the instant cases, however, is that pursuant to the judgment of this Court dated 23.11.2015, the authority for clarification proceeded to take note of the assessment orders passed by the assessing authority and pass an order stating that, in view of the assessment orders already passed, he was not empowered to pass an order on merits in the application for clarification filed by the writ petitioner. It is also relevant to note that even when the writ petitioner filed W.P. (C).No.3579 of 2016 impugning the aforementioned order of the authority for clarification, the respondents in the said writ petition did not have a case that the assessment orders, stated to have been passed by the assessing authority, had been communicated to the writ petitioner before the date of the judgment in W.P.(C). No.35373 of 2015. As a matter of fact, it was under those circumstances that the judgment in W.P.(C).No.3579 of 2016 was passed quashing the assessment orders, and the order passed by the authority for clarification, and directing the latter to pass a fresh order on the application for clarification preferred by the
