Review petition filed against the judgment of W.P(C) 27053/2015 was dismissed for not disclosing any error on the face of the record, while retaining the right to approach the university afresh.
The Review Petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/30TH POUSHA, 1937
RP.No. 1091 of 2015 () IN WP(C).27053/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27053/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-09-2015
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BINOY G.JOHN,
S/O.JOHN GEEVARGHESE, BINOY NIVAS, CHENNITHALA.P.O MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA-690 105.
BY ADVS.SRI.MADHU N.NAMBOOTHIRIPAD SRI.C.E.MANOJ NAIR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
R BY SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J., SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX IN RP. No.1091 of 2015
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS
NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------R.P.No.1091 of 2015 in W.P (C) No.27053 of 2015
Dated this the 20th day of January, 2016
O R D E R
There is no error apparent on the face of the
record and the Review Petition is dismissed.
This will not disable the petitioner from moving the University afresh on the basis of the resolution passed in the meeting of the Syndicate dated 18.12.2015 if the same is applicable.
Sd/V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj/20.01.2016
BINOY G.JOHN
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
