Viji P Issac v. E S Jose
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal disposed of after parties entered settlement agreement mediated through court during pendency of the appeal, directing agreement as part of decree.
What did the court decide?
Terms of settlement agreement dated 15.12.2015 formed part of the decree; appellant entitled to refund of court fee.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/28TH POUSHA, 1937
RFA.No. 769 of 2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 650/2011 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 26-03-2013
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
VIJI P ISSAC AGED 45 YEARS S/O. PONNAAL ISSAC, PONNAL HOUSE, URAMANA P.O. RAMAMANGALAM VIA, MEMURI VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK PIN-686 730.
BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
E S JOSE S/O. MR.SOLAMAN, ERASSERIYIL HOUSE, KATHRIKKADAVU KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017 REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. P.S.PEETHAMBARAN.
R,R BY ADV. SRI.T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN R,R BY ADV. SRI.T.B.GAFOOR R,R BY ADV. SMT.S.SREEDEVI
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VIJI P ISSAC
- respondent
E S JOSE
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court