S.Sobhakumari v. S.Sarojam
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular First Appeal dismissed for default as counsel for appellants gave up vakalath and the respondent stated the decree was satisfied by payment.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default due to failure to proceed and satisfaction of the decree.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/26TH PHALGUNA, 1937
RFA.No. 262 of 2004 (C)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 528/1999 of PRL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM DATED 31-05-2003
APPELLANT(S)/DEFENDANTS.:
- S.SOBHANAKUMARI, W/O.LATE K.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, RESIDING AT SWATHY, PERUMBADOOR LANE, KAZHAKKUTTOM P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- HARIKRISHNAN, S/O.LATE K.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR RESIDING AT SWATHY, PERUMBADOOR LANE KAZHAKUTTOM P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- LAKSHMI, D/O.LATE K.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, RESIDING AT SWATHY, PERUMBADOOR LANE, KAZHAKUTTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Sobhanakumari
- appellant
HARIKRISHNAN
- appellant
LAKSHMI
- respondent
S.SAROJAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court