K.S.E.Board v. Elikutty Chacko
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular first appeal was disposed of after parties reached a mediation settlement, directing the settlement terms to form part of the decree and refunding the court fee.
What did the court decide?
Settlement terms to form part of the decree and refund of court fee.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/3RD PHALGUNA, 1937
RFA.No. 195 of 2006 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS NO.399/2003 of III ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 30-11-2004
APPELLANT(S)/1ST AND 2ND DEFENDANTS.:
- K.S.E.BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
- THE CHIEF ENGINEER, CIVIL WING, K.S.E.BOARD, SMALL HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT, DR.RAJARAM BUILDING, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.PULIKOOL ABUBACKER, STANDING COUNSEL FOR KSEB
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.S.E.BOARD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
- appellant
THE CHIEF ENGINEER, CIVIL WING, K.S.E.BOARD
- respondent
MRS.ELIKUTTY CHACKO
- respondent
VINCY CHACKO
- respondent
JESY CHACKO
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court