Dismissed
C H Ali v. the Federal Bank Limited
Kerala HCOP (DRT)/22/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2016/5TH JYAISHTA, 1938
OP (DRT).No. 22 of 2016 (O)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 296/2013 of DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S)/CERTIFICATE DEBTORS 2 & 3:
1. C H ALI CHALIYADAN HOUSE, PALLIKKAL, ELLUMANNAM P.O. WAYANAD DISTRICT, KERALA STATE - 670 645.
2. BRAN BIYYA
W/O.C.H.ALI, CHALIYADAN HOUSE, PALLIKKAL, ELLUMANNAM P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT, KERALA STATE - 670 645.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN SRI.T.R.TARIN SRI.SANTHAN V.NAIR
RESPONDENT(S)/CERTIFICATE HOLDER:
1. THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED MANANTHAVADY BRANCH, WAYANAD DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENTING OFFICER, THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM 682 031.
2. THE DEBT RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (KERALA AND LAKSHADWEEP), HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, MANORAMA JUNCTION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR P.O., ERNAKULAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT LILLY K T
THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
LSN
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J. ============== O.P.(DRT).No. 22 of 2016
==================
Dated this the 26th day of May, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the matter has become infructuous. The submission is
recorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-A.M.SHAFFIQUE, Judge.
True Copy
P.A to Judge
lsn
C H Ali
Brani Biyya
Federal Bank Limited
A.M. Shauffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court