Vikhnakumar v. Yasodharan
Case brief
What is this about?
Divisional bench dismissed an Original Petition challenging an order staying execution of a money decree, holding that execution proceedings cannot be stayed and no error was seen in the impugned order.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed; execution proceedings cannot be stayed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/21ST POUSHA, 1937
OP(C).No. 88 of 2016 (O)
EP. NO. 225/2014 IN OS NO. 1165/2013 OF ADDL. MUNSIFF COURT-II, NEYYATTINKARA
PETITIONERS/JUDGMENT DEBTORS :
1. VIKHNAKUMAR S/O. NADESAN, KIZHAKKUMKARA VEEDU, KEEZHPALOTTUKONAM KARIKKODUKUZHI WARD, CHEMBOOR DESOM KEEZHAROOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.
2. J. REEJA W/O.VIKHNAKUMAR, KIZHAKKUMKARA VEEDU KEEZHPALOTTUKONAM, KARIKKODUKUZHI WARD, CHEMBOOR DESOM, KEEZHAROOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SUDHEER SMT.N.P.ASHA
RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution proceedings can be stayed in the present circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vikhnakumar S/o. Nadesan
- petitioner
J. Reja W/o. Vikhnakumar
- respondent
Yasodharan S/o. Sreedharan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court