Sudha v. Jessy
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged the Munsiff Court order dismissing an application to set aside a commissioner's report. The High Court set aside the order, directing the report be remitted to the commissioner to adjust boundaries based on a common partition deed of 1956.
What did the court decide?
Order dismissing the application to set aside the commissioner's report was set aside. Commissioner's report remitted to ascertain property based on the 1956 partition deed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/7TH BHADRA, 1938
OP(C).No. 625 of 2016 (O)
-------------------------IA NO. 1184/2014 IN OS 250/2012 of MUNSIFF COURT, NORTH PARAVUR
PETITIONER(S):
SUDHA, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O.DR.MOHANAN, NOW RESIDING AT KACHANIKKODATH, PULLOOR VILLAGE, IRINGALAKUDA MUNICIPALITY, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.SANIL JOSE SRI.EBIN MATHEW
RESPONDENT(S):
1. JESSY, W/O.ANTONY, PUTHUSSERY, KOONAMMAVU P.O,VALLUVALLY MURI, KOTTUVALLY VILLAGE, PIN - 683 518.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should remit the commissioner's report for measurement of land based on the prior title deed.
Whether the commissioner failed to measure the property on the basis of the partition deed of 1956.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHA
- respondent
JESSY
- respondent
ANTONY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court