T.Bright v. Chacko
Case brief
What is this about?
This order disposes of a civil petition filed by a party whose ex parte decree had been set aside. The court directed the trial court to dispose of the underlying suit before July 31, 2016.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the trial court to dispose of the suit before 31.07.2016.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/14TH POUSHA, 1937
OP(C).No. 3179 of 2015 (O)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 89/2015 of PRL.SUB COURT,KOTTAYAM DATED 07-10-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
--------------------------
T.BRIGHT, AGED 40 YEARS S/O.THOMSON, CONTRACTOR RESIDING AT PAPPANAM THOTTATHIL HOUSE, MANJOOR KARA
MANJOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE PALLATTUKARAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was deprived of an opportunity to file an objection to the setting aside of an ex parte decree.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Bright
- respondent
Chacko
Coram
K. Abraham Mathew
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court