Mathew v. Daniel v P.M. Salim
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, under Article 227, directed the lower court to expedite applications to set aside an ex parte decree and stay execution proceedings until those are disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Direct lower court to dispose of pending applications within one month; direct the execution court to keep execution proceedings in abeyance until disposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/4TH KARTHIKA, 1938
OP(C).No. 2032 of 2016 (O)
OS.NO.143/2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MOOVATTUPUZHA
PETITIONER(S):
MATHEW V. DANIEL, S/O. DANIEL, AGED 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT VARICKALAYIL HOUSE, VETTOOR, NALLAD P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 686 669.
BY ADV. SRI.AJEESH S.BRITE
RESPONDENT(S):
P.M. SALIM, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. MEERAN, RESIDING AT THETTILAMARIYIL HOUSE, KAVUMKARA KARA, MARKET P.O., VELLOORKUNNAM VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 673.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether execution proceedings should be stayed pending disposal of a petition to set aside an ex parte decree.
Whether the subordinate court has expedited the pending applications for setting aside the ex parte decree.
Whether the High Court under Article 227 can direct the extraordinary court to keep execution proceedings in abeyance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mathew V. Daniel
- respondent
P.M. Salim
Coram
K. Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court