The High Court of Kerala dismissed a civil petition as infructuous because the petitioner failed to show sufficient interest, evidenced by the unavailability of the impugned order from the lower court by the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/27TH SRAVANA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1914 of 2016 (O)
EA.NO.71/2015 IN EP.315/2005 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR
PETITIONER(S):
SHEIK MUSTHAFA,
S/O.SAHUL HAMEED, AGED 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT ATTAYAMPATHY, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
SMT.RASHMI PATHIYIL
RESPONDENT(S):
GOPAL, S/O.KUMARASWAMI GOUNDER, ATTAYAMPATHY, MUTHALAMADA VILLAGE, GOVINDAPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 507.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
O.P.(C)No.1914 of 2016
....................................................... Dated this the 18th day of August, 2016.
JUDGMENT
When the petition came up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that certified copy of the impugned order has been obtained and the prayer in the petition has become infructuous. This was supported by the report obtained from the court below as well. So, the above submission is recorded and the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
cl
SHEIK MUSTHAFA
SMT. RASHMI PATHIYIL
GOPAL
K. RAMAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
