Radhakrishnan v. Oriental Kuries
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/23RD KARTHIKA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1883 of 2016 (O)
RCP 67/2008 OF PRL.MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR DATED 10.7.2008 ----------
PETITIONER:
RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. ALAYIL SUBRAHMANIAN, VENGIDANGU VILLAGE & DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK & DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. ORIENTAL KURIES LTD, SWARAJ ROUND, THRISSUR-680 001.
2. ASHTAMI LABORATORIES & PHARMACEUTICALS (P) LIMITED REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR. P.S.BALARAMAN. X1/476(1),VELIYYANNUR ROAD,THRISSUR CORPORATION.
BY ADVS. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN SRI.P.T.GIRIJAN SRI.K.GANGADHARAN PILLAI SMT.USHA NARAYANAN SMT.NEENU PAVITHRAN
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
O.P.(C).No.1883 of 2016
Dated this the 14th day of November, 2016.
JUDGMENT
When the petition came up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the original petition has become infructuous as he had already obtained the certified copy. The above submission is recorded and the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.
cl
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
RADHAKRISHNAN
ORIENTAL KURIES LTD
ASHTAMI LABORATORIES & PHARMACEUTICALS (P) LIMITED
K.RAMAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court