Muhammed v. Biju
Case brief
What is this about?
Under Article 227, the High Court stayed the delivery of property in execution proceedings pending the expedited disposal of applications to set aside an ex-parte decree filed in the subordinate court, fixing a two-month deadline.
What did the court decide?
The delivery of property in execution proceedings is kept in abeyance; the subordinate court is directed to dispose of pending applications to set aside the ex-parte decree within two months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2016/12TH SRAVANA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1559 of 2016
EA.NO.965/2015 IN E.P.NO.110/2015 IN OS.568/2011 OF ADDL.SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/DEFENDANT:
MUHAMMED, AGED 52 YEARS, THEVARATH MOITHU, ERIYAD DESOM/VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.ABDUL JALEEL (KODUNGALLUR) SRI.T.V.SHAJI SRI.V.A.AJMAL
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER/PLAINTIFF:
BIJU, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.VAZHKOOTTATHIL RAPHEL, EDAVILANGU VILLAGE, KARA DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK-680671.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct expedited disposal of pending applications to set aside an ex-parte decree while keeping execution proceedings in abeyance.
Whether the delivery of property under a specific performance execution should be stayed pending determination of applications to set aside the decree.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muhammad
- respondent
Biju
Coram
K. Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court