Jameel Sooraj v. Basheer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought direction to dispose of an eviction suit within a time frame due to anticipated delay. Court directed trial court to conclude proceedings in four months without notice to respondent.
What did the court decide?
Direction to trial court to dispose O.S. No.155/13 within four months from receipt of judgment; Notice to respondent dispensed with.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/3RD ASHADHA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1509 of 2016 (O)
OS. NO.155/2013 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PARAPPANANGADI.
PETITIONER(S):
JAMEEL SOORAJ, S/O. KUNHALAN, AGED 37 YEARS, POOZHITHARA HOUSE, KLARI AMSOM DESOM, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN.
RESPONDENT(S):
NAZEER, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI, PULLISSERI HOUSE, KANNAMANGALAM AMSOM DESOM, P.O. KANNAMANGALAM, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 305.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court is directed to dispose of the eviction suit within a specific time frame?
Is notice to the respondent dispensable in matters of urgency?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JAMEEL SOORAJ
- respondent
NAZEER
Coram
K. HARIKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court