Dismissed
V.a.Krishnan v. M.v.Sabu
Kerala HCOP(C)/1458/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2016/20TH ASHADHA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1458 of 2014 (O)
--------------------------EA NO. 862/13 IN EP NO. 373/2011 IN ARC NO. 761/2010 OF DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER :
V.A.KRISHNAN
S/O.KOCHOOTY, AGED 67 YEARS MANGAMKATTU HOUSE, NEAR URULIKKUDY TEMPLE, KURICHILAKKODU, KODANADU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL JACOB
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. M.V.SABU ADVOCATE, SOLE ARBITRATOR, PRINCE TOWER, KOMBARA, MARKET ROAD, COCHIN - 18.
2. M/S.MUTHOOT VEHICLE AND ASSET FINANCE LTD., MUTHOOT CHAMBERS, COCHIN DENTAL CLINIC BUILDING, NEAR COMBARA JUNCTION, MARKET ROAD, KOCHI - 18.
3. LEEMON S/O.LATE VIJAYALAKSHMI, AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS, THAREPARAMBIL HOUSE, PATTIMATTOM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL R3 BY ADV. SRI.BIBIN KUMAR
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
K.HARILAL, J.
O.P.(C). No.1458 of 2014
Dated this the 11th day of July, 2016
JUDGMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The learned counsel for the petitioner sought
for permission to withdraw this original petition so as to file an original petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Permission is granted. This original petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that this judgment will not stand in
the way of seeking proper remedies in accordance with law.
Sd/K. HARILAL, JUDGE
okb.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted to the petitioner to withdraw the original petition to file a fresh writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
V.A. KRISHNAN
M.V. SABU
M/S. MUTHOOT VEHICLE AND ASSET FINANCE LTD.
LEEMON
K. HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court