Devadas v. Devadas
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, being a defendant in a private suit for injunction, challenged a nonspeaking order dismissing his application for appointment of a commission to ascertain if the disputed pathway is public. The High Court disposed of the petition noting the issue of public versus private pathway is for trial evidence.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/11TH ASWINA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1439 of 2016 (O)
O.S No.89/2003 OF THE PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER(S):
DEVADAS AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.SANKU PANATTU HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA
RESPONDENT(S):
1. DEVADAS S/O.THARAYIL KUTTAPPAN KAIPAMANGALAM DESOM AND VILLAGE KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680681.
2. SIVARAMAN S/O.THARAYIL KUTTAPPAN KAIPAMANGALAM DESOM AND VILLAGE KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680681.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order dismissing an application for appointment of Commission for ascertaining whether the way is public used by the petitioner without reasons warrants interferance by this court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Devadas
- respondent
Devadas
- respondent
Sivaraman
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court