Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous because the Collector had already decided the dispute between the parties, rendering the prayer unnecessary.
The petition is dismissed as the prayer has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1350 of 2016 (O)
I.A.NO. 4117/2016 IN O.S.NO. 940/2016 OF THE I-ADDITIONAL MUNSIFFS COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER(S) :
MUHAMMED ABDUL KHADAR, AGED 57 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, ASKAR TRADERS, NEAR CHANDRA PRESS COMPOUND, CHALAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS. SRI.D.KISHORE SMT.MINI GOPINATH SMT.MEERA GOPINATH SRI.R.MURALEEKRISHNAN (MALAKKARA)
RESPONDENT(S) :
ABDUL LATHEEF, S/O. NAHOOR KANNU, HAJI MANZIL, TC 43/802(3), NKRA 82-A, NEELATTINKARA, MANAKKADU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 009.
BY ADVS. SRI.V.S.AFSAL KHAN SRI.I.ANWAR HUSSAIN
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
O.P.(C).No.1350 of 2016
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2016.
JUDGMENT
When the petition came up for hearing today, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the petition has become infructuous as the Collector has already decided the dispute between the parties. The above submission is recorded and the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.
/true copy/
P.S to Judge
cl
MUHAMMED ABDUL KHADAR
ABDUL LATHEEF
K. Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
