Varghese T.T. v. Ksrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging a rent revision order by KSRTC. The Court held that enhanced rent is within the owner's policy decision and not an arbitrary public law action justifying writ intervention.
What did the court decide?
The writ petitions challenging the rent revision were dismissed, allowing the KSRTC's decision to stand.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2016/1ST MAGHA, 1937
OP.No. 10231 of 2003 (R)
PETITIONER(S) :
1. VARGHESE T.T, P.T.ATTENDANT, KSRTC BUS STATION, ALAPPUZHA, PUTHUKKATTU HOUSE, CHERTHALA.
2. AZZEZ, P.T.ATTENDANT, KSRTC BUS STATION, ERNAKULAM, KEZHEKKEVEETTIL, ERUMATHALA P.O.
3. REJENDRAN PILLAI, P.T.ATTENDANT,
- KSRTC BUS STATION, KOLLAM, KOLLEL VEEDU,
- THEKKEVILLA P.O.
4. KUNJEEDI, W/O.ABRAHAM,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision of rent demanded by KSRTC from telephone booth licensees is arbitrary and justify interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Varghese T.T
- petitioner
Azzez
- respondent
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court