Kattil Veettil Kadeesabi v. Arifa
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was not pressed by counsel. The court dismissed the petition on that ground.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2016/1ST BHADRA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1005 of 2016 (O)
IA.NO.3269/2014 OS 94/2014 OF 1ST ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOZHIKODE, DATED 15-11-2014
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS/SUPPLEMENTAL PETITIONERS AND 3RD DEFENDANT:
1. KATTIL VEETTIL KADEESABI, 65 YEARS,NAGARAM AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK.
2. ABOOBACKER, 66 YEARS, S/O.ABDULLA, NAGARAM AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK.
3. ASIMUDHEEN ANSARI, 56 YEARS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WHITE NAGAR, MEDA PARAMB,NAGARAM AMSOM,DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KALLAI-3.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.FIROZ SMT.M.SHAJNA SRI.S.KANNAN SMT.UMMUL FIDA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kattil Veettil Kadeesabi and others
- respondent
Arifa, Muhammed Yunus, and Farsana
Coram
K.Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court