juncture that his wife also sustained injuries in the very same accident which is also evident from the common award passed by the Tribunal. Thus, on this head a sum of 18,300/- is granted, over and above the₹ amount already awarded. On the head of transportation expenses' even though 30,000/- was claimed, only a sum of 2,000/- is seen₹ ₹ granted. The case of the appellant is that even though the accident occurred in Coimbatore, the appellant is a resident of Palakkad. Considering the submission and all these facts, an additional amount of ₹ 3,000/- is granted, over and above the amount already awarded on this head. On the head of extra nourishment' a sum of 2,000/- is₹ seen awarded by the Tribunal. Here is a case of fracture of femur as well as a case of amputation. Considering the duration of treatment and all other attending circumstances a sum of 3,000/- is granted₹ over and above the amount already awarded. On the head of pain and suffering' even though a sum of 50,000/- was claimed, only a₹ sum of 25,000/- is seen awarded by the Tribunal. Surely, it is a case₹ of amputation as well as fracture of femur. Thus, it will be only just and proper to grant 50,000/- on this head. Thus, an amount of₹ ₹ 25,000/- is awarded over and above the amount already granted on this head. The next head on which interference is warranted is loss of amenities and conveniences'. The appellant was aged only 27 years at
