though sans disability certificate, would also support that finding, unless it is arbitrarily and unreasonably fixed so high, an interference is uncalled for. The discussion of the evidence would reveal that the claimant had sustained comminuted fracture and there occurred shortening of leg. Taking into account all those aspects, we are of the considered view that no interference is called for with respect to the assessment of permanent disability by the Tribunal. In such circumstances, taking into account the fact that we have fixed the monthly income of the appellant-injured as 3,000/- a re-assessment of the compensation for permanent disability has to be made. For the said purpose, the monthly income has to be substituted by 3,000/-. Based on such calculation, the appellant would be entitled to get an amount of 4,800/- additionally to what was granted by the Tribunal under that head. It is granted. Towards pain and suffering, the Tribunal granted an amount of 10,000/-. While considering the question whether he is entitled to get any enhancement under the said head, the facts which we have already taken into account have
