9.The Tribunal has awarded 59,967/- as compensation towards loss of earning considering the period of treatment and absence from work as evidenced from Ext.A9 certificate issued by the employer of the petitioner and therefore, interference is uncalled for. Satisfactory compensation was awarded under the head medical and miscellaneous expenses based on medical bills marked in evidence as Ext.A8. Therefore, that factum also does not invite any interference. With regard to transportation expenses, an amount of 1,000/- was claimed by the petitioner/appellant. But the Tribunal was pleased to grant only 500/-, which is on the lower side. Therefore, we are inclined to grant 1000/-, the sum as such claimed by the petitioner. Under the head pain and suffering, the Tribunal granted only a sum of 10,000/- though a claim for 25,000/- was made. On account of the fractures sustained by the appellant on his right calcaneum and medial malleolus, and due to laying of implants at the fracture site in an operation, he must have sustained pain and he needs to be adequately compensated. In view of those aspects, we are of the considered opinion to grant `25,000/-
