Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

V.E.Siraj Vs the Income Tax Officer WARD-2(1) — Income Tax | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
V.E.Siraj Vs the Income Tax Officer WARD-2(1)V.E.Siraj v. the Income Tax Officer WARD-2(1)

Dismissed

V.E.Siraj v. the Income Tax Officer WARD-2(1)

Kerala HC29 Jan 2016ITA/1/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An Income Tax Appeal was dismissed after the single judge followed a direct precedent of this Court.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/9TH MAGHA, 1937

ITA.No. 1 of 2016 ()

--------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 147/2015 of INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 07-10-2015

APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT:

V.E.SIRAJ, VALIYAVEETIL XL/4553, MARKET ROAD, KOCHI 682 003.

BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH KUM.SOUMYA PRAKASH SMT.O.A.NURIYA KUM.MEKHALA M.BENNY

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1) RANGE-2, KOCHI.

Cases cited

Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority

AI extract

ITA.No.278 of 2014Followed¶30

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
V.E. Siraj
respondent
The Income Tax Officer

Coram

AI extract

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 29 Jan 2016 · January
Registered: 8 Jan 2016
Case no.: ITA/1/2016

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Anu Sivaraman Thottathil B.radhakrishnan

M/S.Lakshmi Civil Engineering Services Pvt.Ltd Vs Sri.Ajith Patel
28 Jan 2016
Girish Babu Vs M/S.Lulu Convention and Exhibition Centre Private Ltd.
28 Jan 2016
Thuravoor Mahakshethra Bhakthajana Samity Vs the Travancore Devaswom Board
27 Jan 2016
M.a.Aboobacker Vs Kerala State Wakf Board

Cite this judgement

V.E.Siraj v. the Income Tax Officer WARD-2(1), ITA/1/2016 (KL), decided on 29 January 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Cases cited1

ITA.No.278 of 2014Followed¶30

Open Authorities

Bench / Coram

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan and Anu Sivaraman

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The appeal was dismissed as the issues were directly covered in favour of the Department in an earlier decision of this Court (ITA No. 278 of 2014 dated 3.7.2015). The Court followed said precedent and dismissed the appeal accordingly.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DG

ITA.No. 1 of 2016 ()

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE - A: COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 DATED 27.12.2011 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT.

ANNEXURE - B: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 30.9.2014.

ANNEXURE - C: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH DATED 7.10.2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A TO JUDGE

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &

ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ.

I.T.A.No.1 of 2016

Dated this the 29^th day of January, 2016

J U D G M E N T

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

The learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the Department submit that the issues raised in this case are directly covered in favour of the Department as per the judgment of this Court dated 3.7.2015 in ITA.No.278 of 2014. No other points raised. We, therefore, follow the afore-noted precedent and dismiss this appeal accordingly.

Sd/-

(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE)

Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE)

//TRUE COPY//

P.A TO JUDGE

DG

Anu Sivaraman

CNR

KLHC010268002016

Topic

Bench

Anu Sivaraman Thottathil B.radhakrishnan

Disposal

DISMISSED

29 Jan 2016

M.a.Nazar Vs the Intelligence Officer

29 Jan 2016

State of Kerala Vs Sri.Shefeer .U.H

29 Jan 2016