The Income Tax Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The Revenue side informed the court that it is not pursuing the appeals due to Circular No.21/2015 issued by the CBDT.
Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/20TH JYAISHTA, 1938
ITA.No. 1687 of 2009 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 297/COCH/2001 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 10-02-2009
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT::
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT::
M/S.MALAYALA MANORAMA CO. LTD.,
KOTTAYAM.
R, BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR R, BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI R, BY ADV. SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS R, BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH R, BY ADV. SRI.RAJA KANNAN
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-06-2016, ALONG WITH ITA.84/10 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ.
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
Counsel for the Revenue submits that they are not pursuing these appeals in view of Circular No.21/2015 issued by the CBDT.
In view of the submission so made, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. Sd/DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, Judge.
kkb.
/True copy/
PS to Judge
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM
M/S.MALAYALA MANORAMA CO. LTD.
ANTONY DOMINIC
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
