Yamuna S v. Anilkumar.P
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court modified an order appointing an Advocate Receiver for specific property items, restricting the Receiver's role to verification while allowing appellants to manage the property, and directed disposal of the suit within six months.
What did the court decide?
Modified the order granting appointment of an Advocate Receiver to specific property items; allowed appellants to manage property under Receiver; directed disposal of suit within six months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/3RD KARTHIKA, 1938
FAO.No. 238 of 2016 ()
ORDER DT.6.10.2016 IN I.A.No.2616/16 IN O.S.No.269/2015 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
- YAMUNA S
AGED 49 YEARS, D/O. SIVAN PILLAI, NOW RESIDING AT SREE PADAM, VALIAKKUNNU, ATTINGAL-695 101, AVANAVANCHERRY VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
- VELAYUDHAN PILLAI S.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should modify the lower court's order regarding the appointment of an Advocate Receiver for specific property items.
Whether the Receiver's powers to inspect and verify accounts should be framed to protect the appellants' interests in managing the property.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
YAMUNA S
- appellant
VELAYUDHAN PILLAI S
- appellant
GANGA S
- appellant
SINDHU S
- respondent
ANILKUMAR.P
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court