A civil revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel stated there was no instruction from the party. The court recorded the submission and disposed of the matter accordingly without substantive legal determination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/23RD KARTHIKA, 1938
CRP.No. 620 of 2013
E.P.NO. 62 OF 2012 IN O.S.NO. 3 OF 1988 OF THE SUBORDINATE COURT, TIRUR
PETITIONER(S)/PLAINTIFF :
SNEHAN GEORGE, AGED 51 YEARS,
S/O. OLIKKARA VEETTIL GEORGE, THOTTEKKATTU VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS. SRI.SAJU.S.A
SMT.P.A.SHEEJA
SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANT :
HYDRU HAJI, S/O. EDASSERY VALAPPIL ASSAINAR, PALLIKKARA AMSOM DESOM, PONANI TALUK-673 522.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
C.R.P.No.620 of 2013
...................................................... Dated this the 14th day of November, 2016.
ORDER
When the civil revision petition came up for hearing today in the defect list, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has no instruction from the party. The above submission is recorded and the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (K. Ramakrishnan, Judge)
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
ss
Snehan George
Hydru Haji
K. Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
