pleased not guilty. In order to prove the case of the complainant, complainant himself was examined as PW1 and one witness was examined as PW2 and Exts.P1 to P5 were marked on his side. After closure of the complainant's evidence, the accused was questioned under section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and he denied all the incriminating circumstances brought against him in the complainant's evidence. He had further stated that he had borowed ony Rs. 30,000/- and he had paid the amount with interest, but the complainant demanded Rs.7,000/- more for which he was not amenable, so blank signed cheque given by him as security was misused and the present complaint was filed. But no defence evidence was adduced on his side. After considering the evidence on record, the court below found the revision petitioner guilty under section 138 of the Act and convicted him thereunder and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and also to pay a fine of Rs.2,30,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months more and it is further ordered that if fine amount is realized, the same be paid to the complainant as compensation under section 357(1)(b) of the Code wrongly shown as section 357 (3) of the Code in the judgment of the court below. Aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner filed Crl.A.No.47/2012 before the
