K.Gopakumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala dismissed a criminal revision petition against conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding no perversity or error.
What did the court decide?
The revision petition is dismissed. The revision petitioner is granted six months to pay the compensation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/4TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2443 of 2010 ( )
CRA 179/2008 of II ADDL.D.C.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CC 233/1997 of J.M.F.C.-I,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
K.GOPAKUMAR, INDIRA BHAVAN,
T.C.36/547(1), PALKULANGARA,, KAYYALATHU LANE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:
- THE STATE OF KERALA,
- REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ` ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the concurrent finding of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act warrants interference by this court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Gopakumar
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
R.V.Satheesh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court