M.Gopinath v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the criminal revision petition as infructuous noting it had become so without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/31ST BHADRA, 1938H
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1629 of 2009 ( )
CC 244/2006 of J.M.F.C.-II, KANNUR
REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONERS/12TH ACCUSED:
M.GOPINATH,AGED 52, PROP:LAKSHMI TRADERS,, AMBIKA COMPLEX,PALLIKUNNU P.O. KANNUR-4,RESIDING AT LAKSHMI, PALLIKUNNU.
BY ADVS.SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SMT.R.LEELA
RESPONDENT/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI.C.K.PRASAD
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
O R D E R
When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the
learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted
that the matter has become infructuous.
In the result, this revision petition stands dismissed
as infructuous.
SD/-
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE
dl/23.9.2016
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
M.Gopinath
State of Kerala
B.Sudheendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court