Dismissed

Shanraj v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC28 Mar 2016Crl.MC/563/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail related criminal miscellaneous petition, the High Court observed that the contentions raised by counsel could be taken before the trial court at an appropriate stage, including during trial. The court disposed of the matter by directing the lower court to consider bail applications within 10 days.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of; the trial court directed to dispose of bail application within 10 days.

Shanraj Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

¶4

MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/8TH CHAITHRA, 1938

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 563 of 2016 ()

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER IN CC 1144/2014 of J.M.F.C., KARUNAGAPPALLY CRIME NO. 3838/2013 OF KARUNAAGAPALLY POLICE STATION , KOLLAM

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 TO 3:

¶8

SHANRAJ, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, LAKSHMI VILASAM, KALLELI BHAGAM P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY 690519

¶9

SHICHURAJ, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, LAKSHMI VILASAOM, KALLELI BHAGAM P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY 690519

¶10

S. JAYAPRAKASH, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.LATE SUKUMARAN, LAKSHMI VILASAOM, KALLELI BHAGAM P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY -690519, NOW R/A.LAKSHMI CHAITHANYA, MARUTHOOR KULANGARA SOUTH, ALUMKADAVU P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY

¶11

BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW

¶12

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

¶13

STATE OF KERALA REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM

¶14

BIJUKUMAR

¶15

S/O.,SIVANANDAN, KOTTAVEETTIL VADAKKATHIL, KALLELI BHAGOM P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY 690519

¶16

R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.VENUGOPAL R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

Crl.MC.No. 563 of 2016 ()

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶21

----------------------ANNEXURE 1:-COPY OF FIR NO 3838/2013 IN CRIME NO 3838/2013

¶22

ANNEXURE 2:-COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO 3838/2013

¶23

ANNEXURE 3:-COPY OF ACCIDENT CUM WOUND CERTIFICATE

¶24

ANNEXURE 4:-COPY OF FIR NO 3839/2013

¶25

ANNEXURE 5:-COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO 3839/2013

¶26

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL

¶27

// True Copy //

¶28

PA to Judge

¶29

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

¶30

¶31

Crl.M.C. No.563 of 2016

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

On hearing either side, this Court is of the view

¶36

that the matters presently raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners are matters which can be taken up before the court below at appropriate stage. With liberty to the petitioner to take up all these contentions before the court below either at the stage of seeking a discharge or during trial, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of. As far as practicable, the court below shall grant exemption from personal appearance to the petitioners. Their personal appearance shall be insisted, only on the posting dates on which their personal appearance is actually required.

¶37

Crl.M.C.563/2016

¶38

: 2 :

¶39

The court below is directed to dispose of the

¶40

application seeking bail, if any filed by the petitioners, on their surrender before the court below within 10 days from

¶41

today, on the date of filing itself.

¶42

Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE)

¶43

aks/28/03

¶44

// True Copy //

¶45

PA to Judge

Shanraj v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanraj v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Hasim Vs Union Territory of Lekshadweep

Rajkumar Vs State of Kerala

Gireesh.M Vs the State of Kerala

Mohammed Shafi Vs State of Kerala

Achu Vs State of Kerala

Murugan v. Vs the S.I. of Police