Rahul Ramesh v. Sanal Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/25TH POUSHA, 1937
Crl.MC.No. 277 of 2016
SC 883/2014 OF ADDL. SUB COURT, KOLLAM CRIME NO. 1186/2011 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 TO 6:
1. RAHUL RAMESH, AGED 24 YEARS OLD, S/O.RAMESH, REMANI BHAVAN, THEKKEVILA P.O. KOLLAM-691016.
2. ASHIK, AGED 24 YEARS OLD, S/O.NAZAR, PUNNAKULATHU VAYALIL, ERAVIPURAM P.O. KOLLAM.
3. RENJITH R., AGED 27 YEARS OLD, S/O.RAMESH P., REMANI BHAVAN, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM-691 016.
4. BYJU B., AGED 24 YEARS OLD, S/O.BABU, SUNDARAM VETTAM, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM-691 016.
5. JOMON JOHNSON, AGED 24 YEARS OLD, S/O.JOHNSON, HRIDAYA BHAVAN, PUTHENNADA, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM-691 016.
6. VISHNU R., AGED 25 YEARS OLD, S/O.RAJAN, ERATHAZHIKATHU KIZHAKKATHIL, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM-691 016.
BY ADV. SRI.S.SHAJI
RESPONDENT(S)/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND STATE:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. SANAL KUMAR, AGED 23 YEARS OLD, S/O.SADASIVAN, SREEMURUKALAYAM VEEDU, EAST OF CHAYAKKADA MUKKU, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM-691 016.
msv/
-2-
-2-
Crl.MC.No. 277 of 2016
2. MAHESH, AGED 24 YEARS OLD, S/O.SIVARAMAN, KATTIYIL KIZHAKKATHIL, PUTHENNADA, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM-691 016.
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
R1-R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.E.ISHAQ R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.MAYA
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
Crl.MC.No. 277 of 2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:
ANNEUXRE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1186/2011 ALONG WITH FIS REGISTERED BY ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.1186/2011 BY ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.4.1.2016.
ANNEUXRE A4: TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.4.1.2016.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S.TO JUDGE
Msv/
B. KEMAL PASHA, J.
===================== CRL.M.C.No.277 of 2016 ====================== Dated this the 15th day of January, 2016
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and
the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2.
in the matter, this Court is of the view that this is not a fit case wherein this Court can order a premature termination of the prosecution. Of course, considering the fact that the
CRL.M.C.No.277 of 2016 -: 2 :-
matter has been settled between the parties, the court below can take the case out of turn and expedite the disposal.
With the said observation, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed.
Sd/-
B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE.
DSV/15/1/16
// True Copy //
P.A. To Judge
RAHUL RAMESH
ASHIK
RENJITH R.
BYJU B.
JOMON JOHNSON
VISHNU R.
B. KEMAL PASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court