Allowed

Risvi Mohammed v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC12 Feb 2016Crl.MC/153/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition and quashed all further proceedings against the accused in the underlying criminal case following an amicable settlement between the petitioner and the de facto complainant, who affirmed no purpose would be served in continuing the matter.

What did the court decide?

All further proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No. 67/2013 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam, are quashed.

Risvi Mohammed Vs State of Kerala — Quashing and FIR | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/23RD MAGHA, 1937

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 153 of 2016 ()

¶6

CC.NO. 67/2013 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :

¶8

RISVI MOHAMMED, AGED 32 YEARS S/O.MOHAMED, ARACKAL HOUSE, THANGAL NAGAR PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-682 006.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.C.M.NAZAR

¶10

SRI.MANSOOR B.H.

¶11

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :

¶12

1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. REPRESENTING STATION HOUSE OFFICER CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶13

2. JINAS, AGED 42 YEARS S/O.P.K.ABDULRAHMAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR GALAXY HOMES (P) LTD., GALAXY SQUARE, RAJAJI JUNCTION M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682 035.

¶14

R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. P. MAYA R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.U.ZIYAD

¶15

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

¶17

...2/-

¶18

Crl.MC.No. 153 of 2016 ()

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

¶21

ANNEXURE-A: CERTIFIED COPY OF CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.67/2013 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM. ANNEXURE-B: AFFIDAVIT OF 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES : NIL -------------------------------------------------------------//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

¶22

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

¶23

¶24

Crl.M.C. No.153 of 2016

¶25

Dated this the 12^th day of February, 2016

¶26

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

¶27

Petitioner is the accused in CC No.67/2013 of the

¶28

Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam, which has arisen from Crime No.960/2013 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam, for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 and 506(ii) IPC.

¶29

It seems that the matter has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the de facto complainant, who is the 2^nd respondent herein.

¶30

The 2^nd respondent has filed Annexure-B affidavit affirming that the matter has been amicably settled between him and the petitioner and presently, he has no complaints against the petitioner. No criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner. No purpose would be served

¶31

in proceeding with the matter further. Matters being so, all

¶32

Crl.M.C.153/2016

¶33

: 2 :

¶34

further proceedings against the petitioner in CC No.67/2013 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam, which has arisen from Crime No.960/2013 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam, can be quashed.

¶35

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed and all further proceedings against the petitioner in CC No.67/2013 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam, which has arisen from Crime No.960/2013 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam, are quashed.

¶36

Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE)

¶37

aks/12/02

¶38

// True Copy //

¶39

PA to Judge

Risvi Mohammed v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Risvi Mohammed v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Xavier Biju Vs State of Kerala

Ejas Ahammed Molathai Vs State of Kerala

Kiran Ghosh Vs State of Kerala

Saji Kuriakose Vs State of Kerala

Bava @ Rafeek Vs State of Kerala

Raslef Vs Nadeer P.P.