Dismissed
Shagen N. v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCCrl.MC/1226/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2016/5TH SRAVANA, 1938
Crl.MC.No. 1226 of 2016
CRIME NO. 1/2016 OF VAIKOM EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KOTTAYAM
PETITIONER(S):
SHAGEN N., AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN (LATE), MANGALATHUTHARA HOUSE, THALAYAZHAM P.O. VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR, EXCISE DEPARTMENT, VAIKOM RANGE AND CIRCLE, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686141.
3. EXCISE INSPECTOR EXCISE DEPARTMENT, VAIKOM-686141.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN.V, J
----------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No.1226 of 2016
----------------------------------------Dated this the 27th day of July, 2016
O R D E R
When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the final report has been filed in the above matter and prays that the instant petition be dismissed without prejudice to his right to challenge the final report. The petition is accordingly dismissed reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the final report.
Sd/RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN.V. JUDGE
vps
Shagen N.
State of Kerala
Circle Inspector, Excise Department
Excise Inspector
Raja Vijayaraghavan.V
J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court