K.M.Thampan v. Sajeevan
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal dismissed as withdrawn after the appellant sought to abandon the appeal due to the learned Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence without obtaining the mandatory government sanction under Section 196(1) CrPC.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/27TH MAGHA, 1937
CRL.A.No. 2185 of 2004 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Crl.L.P. 479/2004 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 02-08-2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 342/2001 of J.M.F.C.-II, KANNUR DATED 2904-2004
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT::
K.M. THAMPAN, S/O. PARVATHI KALLIASSERI AMSOM, IRINAVU DESOM, P.O. IRINAVU DIST.KANNUR.
BY ADV. SMT.VIDHYA. A.C
RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED::
- SAJEEVAN, S/O. GOPALAN, KOLATHVAYAL, P.O. ANCHAMPEEDIKA, VIA. MATTAMMAL DIST. KANNUR.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.M. Thampan
- respondent
Sajeevan
- respondent
Vimal
- respondent
Najesh
- respondent
Pradeepan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court