T.Surendran v. P.K.Sivadasan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal appeal, the court notes that while the appellant represents lack of interest, the final order is an adjournment due to the absence of all parties and issuance of notice for a future hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/21ST MAGHA, 1937
CRL.A.No. 1885 of 2004 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 187/1999 of JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, TIRUR DATED 11-02-2004
APPELLANT(S)/COMPLAINANT::
T.SURENDRAN, S/O.RAVUNNI NAIR, THARAYIL HOUSE, MUTHOOR, TIRUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR
RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED AND STATE::
1. P.K.SIVADASAN, S/O.PANKAJAKSHI AMMA, KIZHEKKEKALAM, P.O. PUTHUPALLY, TIRUR MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.SURENDRAN
- respondent
P.K.SIVADASAN
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court