The Court dismissed a criminal appeal as the appellant, having settled the matter with the respondent, expressed lack of interest in further prosecution.
Criminal Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/30TH POUSHA, 1937
CRL.A.No. 1583 of 2004 (C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN C.C.NO. 80/1999 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATES COURT NO. I, SULTHAN BATHERY
APPELLANT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
T.R.MODU,S/O.LATE AHAMMED THOTENVEEDU, CHETTAPALAM, MANANTHAVADI WAYANAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRAN
SRI.M.B.PRAJITH
RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED/STATE:
1. P.P.SADHANANDAN,S/O.KUNHIRAMAN SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEENANGADI POLICE STATION MEENANGADI.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.M.MOHAMMED KUNHI R1 BY ADV. SRI.PRASUN.S R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI N SURESH
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
LSN
P.D.RAJAN, J.
Crl.Appeal. No. 1583 of 2004
---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
As directed earlier on 11.01.2016, both
appellant and the first respondent present. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant and respondent submitted that they have settled the matter and appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
In the circumstances, this appeal is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/- P.D.RAJAN, Judge
lsn
T.R.MODU
P.P.SADHANANDAN
STATE OF KERALA
P.D.RAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
