V.A. Sasi v. Gopalakrishna Bhat I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case, the petitioner challenged the dismissal of a writ petition regarding Scheduled Caste benefits. The respondent submitted that administrative sanction was obtained on the date of hearing. The court accepted this submission.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case closed; respondents directed to communicate decision without delay.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
SATURDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/15TH SRAVANA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 905 of 2016 (S) ------------------------------WP(C) 10515/2016 DATED 23-03-2016 ---------------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ----------------------
V.A. SASI, S/O. APPUKKUTTAN(LATE), AGED 57 YEARS, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KATTIKKUNNU, P.O.CHEMPU, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT I.A.S, (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE DIRECTOR OF SCHEDULED CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt of court proceedings should be closed upon submission that administrative sanction was granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.A. SASI
- respondent
GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT I.A.S
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court