Beena Nair v. Mr.Manomohan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged non-compliance in a contempt case regarding a land deed correction. Court held directions were complied with and closed the case without costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case stood closed without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/23RD KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 714 of 2016 (S)
---------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 10871/2015 DATED 9/6/2015)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BEENA NAIR, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.N.K.K.NAIR, T.C.36/1466 (1), 'KRISHNA', VALLAKKADAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN
SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT :
MR.MANOMOHAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE COMPLEX, NEDUMANGAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT- 695 541.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BEENA NAIR
- respondent
MR.MANOMOHAN
Coram
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court