K.M.Santhosh v. Arijith Basu
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2016/10TH ASHADHA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 684 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).243/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 243/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 05-02-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC.:
K.M.SANTHOSH
AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.M.N.B.PILLAI, LOVE LAND, VALIYAVEEDU LANE, VATTIYOORKAVU PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW WORKING AS SENIOR BRANCH SALES MANAGER, SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, MOOVATTUPUZHA.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 & 4 IN WPC.:
1. ARIJITH BASU
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REGD AND CORPORATE OFFICE, NATRAJ, MV ROAD, AND WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY JUNCTION, ANDHERI, MUMBAI-400 069.
2. SUBASH BABU
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, KERALA REGION, SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAKKARA BUILDING, VELLYAMBALAM, VAZHUTHACAUD ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 010.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.) R2 BY ADV. SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 684 of 2016 (S) ::2::
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE I: TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DT 22.4.2015 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER
ANNEXURE II: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT 5.2.2016 IN WPC 243/2016
ANNEXURE III: TRUE COPY OF THE PAY SLIP FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER AS REGARDS PETITIONER
ANNEXURE IV: TRUE COPY OFHTE PAY SLIP FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY AS REGARDS PETITIONER
ANNEXURE V: TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE MKV RUPKUMAR DATED 19.1.2015
ANNEXURE VI: TRUE COPY OFHTE SAID LETTER DT 15.3.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER
ANNEXURE VII: COPY OF LETTER DT 2.4.2016 ISSUED BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR TO THE PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURE: NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A TO JUDGE
jma
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
Cont.Case © No.684 of 2016
in
W.P(C) No. 243 of 2016 S
Dated this the 01st day of July, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
contempt petition can be closed. Contempt Petition closed.
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)
jma
//true copy//
P. A To Judge
K.M.SANTHOSH
ARIJITH BASU
SUBASH BABU
K VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court