The Court on admission clarified that the underlying writ petition case requiring compliance is extended in time. If the petitioner fails to comply within the extended deadline, they may revive the contempt proceedings.
Contempt case closed subject to extended time for compliance; option to revive if not complied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2016/1ST ASHADHA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 641 of 2016 (S)
WP(C).2788/2013, DATED 21-07-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC.2788/2013:
M.M. BABU, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. MATHEW, MELERIL, PERINGOL KARA, IKKARANADU NORTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT MALERIL HOUSE, MANANTHADAM, PUTHENCRUZ P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.KOSHY
SRI.ANIL GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 IN WPC.2788/2013:
1. M.G. RAJAMANICKAM, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030.
2. AMIT MEENA,
R1 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
Con.Case(C).No. 641 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21/7/15 IN WPC.NO. PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD
ANNEXURE B1: TRUE COPY OF POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD
ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF LAWYER NOTICE DATED 5/2/16.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES
NIL.
/ TRUE COPY /
P.S. TO JUDGE
PJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
----------------------------------
C.O.C. No.641 of 2016-S In W.P(C). No.2788 of 2013-W
---------------------------------Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2016
JUDGMENT
Since the time granted as per Annexure A judgment dated 21.07.2015 in WP(C) No.2788 of 2013 is extended, the C.O.C. would stand closed. If the compliance is not made within the extended time, the petitioner can revive the contempt case.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge.
sp/22/06/16
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP(C). No.2788 of 2013Referred¶35
M.M. Babu
District Collector, Ernakulam
Amit Meena
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
