Dr.Joseph Issac v. Bhanu Pratap Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/17TH JYAISHTA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 530 of 2016 (S)
WP(C).27432/2013, DATED 13/11/2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC:
DR.JOSEPH ISSAC, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.LATE K.E.ISAAC, RESIDING AT ISAAC'S TOWER, 37/1624, JAWAHAR NAGAR, S.C.ROAD, KOCHI, PIN- 682 020.
BY ADVS.SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SRI.R.HARISHANKAR
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC:
BHANU PRATAP SHARMA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI -110 001.
BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
Con.Case(C).No. 530 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF TH JUDGMENT IN WPC.2732/2013 DATED 13/11/15 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
ANNEXURE 2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HONOURABLE UNION HEALTH MINISTER DATED 21/11/2015.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES
NIL.
/ TRUE COPY /
P.S. TO JUDGE
PJ
**A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J * * * * * * * * * * * ***
Cont.Case No.530 of 2016
Dated this the 7th day of June 2016
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the directions issued in the judgment dated 13/11/2015 in W.P.C.No.27432/2013 has been complied with.
Taking on record the aforesaid submission, this contempt
case is dropped.
(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
jsr
DR.JOSEPH ISSAC
BHANU PRATAP SHARMA
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court