A contempt case was finally heard on 07-06-2016. The Court closed the contempt proceedings without prejudice to the petitioner's right to approach the Court again in the same jurisdiction if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/17TH JYAISHTA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 504 of 2011 (S)
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12997/2011
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
K.J.THOMAS, AGED 47, S/O.JOSEPH, PROPRIETOR 'ANAND AMBANI MINI INDUSTRIES, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI.
BY ADV. SRI.M.C.JOHN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1-3:
ADDL. RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 IMPLEADED
Impleaded as per order dt. 15.3.16 in IA 72/16.
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SAJAN JAMES
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.B.Suresh Kumar, J.
Con. Case(C)No.504 of 2011 S in
W.P.(C) No.12997 of 2011
Dated this the 7th day of June, 2016
JUDGMENT
In the light of the subsequent developments, the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move this Court again in the same jurisdiction, if required.
P.B.Suresh Kumar, Judge
tkv
K.J. Thomas
Sobha Kamla Sudarsana Rao
G.M. Kochukanjim
N.P. Sajeevan
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
