Sreekumar v. C.M.George
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt court case was filed alleging non-compliance of a previous direction. The Court was informed that the direction had already been complied with and no complaint existed thereafter. The case was finally closed on the same day it was heard.
What did the court decide?
This contempt case is closed as the alleged non-compliance was voluntary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2016/13TH ASHADHA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 370 of 2005 (S)
-------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 31920/2004 DATED 10-12-2004)
PETITIONER.:
SREEKUMAR, THAIPARAMBIL, PATHIRAPPALLY P.O., NEAD UDAYA STUDIO, ALAPPUZHA.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. P.HARIDAS, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.P.SANKU, THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
KERALA STATE, ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATHIRAPPILLY, ALAPPUZHA.
2. RAMANUJAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sreekumar
- respondent
P. Haridas
- respondent
Ramanujan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court